PlanetScale Alternatives 2026: MySQL & Postgres Options

PlanetScale has changed substantially from the product many developers still remember. In 2026 it is no longer just a serverless MySQL platform: PlanetScale now offers both Vitess for MySQL-compatible workloads and PlanetScale Postgres, with high-availability and high-performance deployment options, database branching, deploy workflows, and production query tooling.

That makes “PlanetScale alternative” a broader decision than it was a few years ago. Some teams want to keep MySQL compatibility. Others are comfortable moving to Postgres. Some are primarily searching for a cheaper database. Others actually need PlanetScale's branching, non-blocking schema changes, or Vitess-style horizontal scaling.

For small and mid-sized teams, the most useful alternatives break into four models: Raff Managed MySQL/PostgreSQL for straightforward managed databases with fixed plan pricing, Neon for serverless Postgres with scale-to-zero and database branching, Supabase for Postgres bundled into a broader backend platform, and staying with PlanetScale when Vitess, its schema workflow, or its high-scale architecture is the requirement.

PlanetScale alternatives at a glance

Short answer: stay with PlanetScale when Vitess, high-scale sharding, its branch/deploy workflow, or PlanetScale-specific operational tooling is part of the requirement. Choose Raff when you mainly need a managed MySQL or PostgreSQL database with a familiar engine and a simpler fixed-plan bill. Choose Neon when serverless Postgres and scale-to-zero are the priority. Choose Supabase when the database is one component of a complete backend platform.

Why teams look for PlanetScale alternatives

The reasons have changed over time.

Earlier PlanetScale-alternative searches were often driven by the removal of its old Hobby plan. In 2026 the product itself has expanded: PlanetScale now sells Postgres as well as Vitess, publishes resource-based pricing, and continues to invest in database branches, safe migrations, schema recommendations, CLI tooling, and production insights.

Today, teams usually evaluate alternatives for one of six reasons:

• they want a free database tier for a small project or staging environment;
• they want conventional MySQL/Postgres without the additional Vitess layer;
• they prefer a fixed monthly plan instead of resource-based billing;
• they need a broader backend platform such as auth, object storage, realtime, and APIs;
• they want serverless Postgres that scales compute down when idle;
• they no longer need PlanetScale-specific branching, schema-deployment, or horizontal-sharding capabilities.

The correct alternative depends on which of those problems you are actually solving.

PlanetScale in 2026: Postgres and Vitess, not just “serverless MySQL”

PlanetScale's current public pricing surface supports two database engines:

• PlanetScale Postgres;
• Vitess, built around MySQL compatibility and horizontal scaling.

PlanetScale currently lists Postgres single-node deployments starting at $5/month, high-performance Metal deployments starting at $50/month, and high-availability configurations with a primary plus two replicas across three availability zones. Vitess pricing is based on cluster size, VTGate configuration, storage, and the selected infrastructure profile.

The current pricing page also includes 100 GB of egress bandwidth, with additional egress listed at $0.06/GB.

PlanetScale's strongest differentiator is not simply “we host a database.” Its Vitess product continues to combine vanilla MySQL with routing, control-plane components, and horizontal-sharding architecture. PlanetScale also continues to invest heavily in schema workflow: branches, deploy requests, safe migrations, non-blocking schema changes, query insights, and automation through its CLI/API/Terraform tooling.

Choose PlanetScale when several of these are true:

• horizontal MySQL scaling through Vitess is part of the architecture;
• database branching is integrated into the development workflow;
• non-blocking production schema changes are a recurring requirement;
• the team values PlanetScale's deploy-request and schema-analysis workflow;
• PlanetScale's performance-oriented infrastructure profiles fit the workload;
• the organization is comfortable with resource-based pricing.

If those are not requirements, a simpler managed database may be easier to operate and budget.

Raff: best when you want familiar MySQL or Postgres with a smaller operational surface

Raff Managed Databases is the most direct alternative in this comparison for a team that mainly wants the database engine itself managed.

Raff currently offers managed PostgreSQL and MySQL alongside Valkey, Kafka, ClickHouse and MongoDB. PostgreSQL, MySQL and Valkey also have a free tier: one free database per account, no fixed trial expiry, with inactive free databases pausing after seven days without a connection while retaining their data.

Paid MySQL and PostgreSQL plans currently start at $7.99/month. The entry MySQL plan includes 1 vCPU, 1 GB RAM and 25 GB NVMe storage, with daily backups included. Raff's MySQL service runs MySQL 8 with InnoDB; high-availability MySQL plans use a three-node Galera design behind HAProxy.

Raff is a stronger fit when:

• standard MySQL 8 or PostgreSQL compatibility is preferable to a specialized distributed database layer;
• the team wants a clear fixed monthly plan;
• backups, monitoring, private networking and migration support should be part of the managed service boundary;
• a free database is useful for development or a small workload;
• the application already runs on a conventional ORM or framework and should not need a database-architecture rewrite;
• direct migration assistance matters more than sophisticated database branching.

Raff is not a drop-in replacement for every PlanetScale architecture. A workload that depends on Vitess horizontal sharding, PlanetScale-specific branching, or deploy-request workflows should treat those as migration requirements, not optional features.

For the broader operating-model decision, read MySQL Hosting: Managed vs Self-Hosted for Production Apps.

Neon: best when the real requirement is serverless Postgres

Neon is a better PlanetScale alternative when the application can use Postgres and the priority is serverless behavior rather than MySQL compatibility.

Neon's current platform uses a usage-based pricing model and can scale idle compute to zero. Its Free plan remains available, while paid Launch and Scale plans meter compute usage rather than requiring a fixed monthly minimum. Neon also puts database branching at the center of its developer workflow.

Current Neon pricing guidance lists:

• a Free plan with multiple projects and per-project compute allowances;
• Launch compute currently priced at $0.106 per CU-hour;
• Scale compute currently priced at $0.222 per CU-hour;
• 500 GB of public data transfer included each month on paid plans as of June 2026.

Neon is strongest when:

• Postgres is acceptable or already used;
• workloads are bursty or spend long periods idle;
• scale-to-zero can materially reduce compute consumption;
• branch-per-preview or branch-per-development workflows are important;
• the team prefers metered serverless economics over fixed capacity plans.

Neon is not the right direct substitute when retaining MySQL compatibility is mandatory. Moving from PlanetScale Vitess/MySQL to Neon is a database-engine migration, not just a provider migration.

Raff already has a dedicated Neon Alternative 2026 comparison for that narrower provider decision.

Supabase: best when PlanetScale is only one part of the backend you need

Supabase is not primarily a PlanetScale-style database platform. It is a broader backend platform built around Postgres.

Its value becomes clear when the application needs several services together:

• managed Postgres;
• authentication;
• object/file storage;
• realtime updates;
• generated APIs;
• edge functions;
• backend administration tooling.

Supabase currently offers a Free plan at $0/month and a Pro plan from $25/month. The current Free plan includes a 500 MB database per project. Pro includes an 8 GB disk allocation per project before additional storage charges and includes daily backups with seven-day retention.

Choose Supabase when:

• the app needs a backend platform rather than only a database;
• Postgres is already the preferred engine;
• built-in auth, storage, realtime and APIs reduce application engineering;
• the team's architecture benefits from consolidating those backend services.

Choose another option when the application only needs MySQL/Postgres and the broader platform would add concepts, billing dimensions or migration dependencies that the team does not need.

Raff already publishes a dedicated Supabase Alternative 2026 comparison for teams evaluating that specific switch.

PlanetScale vs Raff: the most direct small-team decision

For a small team that is not choosing a full backend platform, the most relevant comparison is often PlanetScale vs Raff.

The question is therefore not simply “which starts cheaper?” PlanetScale's Postgres entry price can be lower than Raff's paid entry plan, while Raff also has a free database tier. Those numbers describe different capacity models and platform behavior.

Choose from architecture first, then compare equivalent production configurations.

What about TiDB, Railway and other PlanetScale alternatives?

Several other products can make sense depending on the workload.

TiDB

TiDB is worth evaluating when retaining MySQL-style application compatibility and distributed horizontal scaling are more important than using conventional MySQL. It competes more directly with the distributed-database problem PlanetScale Vitess solves than Postgres-first alternatives do.

Railway

Railway is useful when the database should live beside application deployments in a developer platform. It can be convenient for small teams that value one deployment workflow for apps and databases, but the purchasing decision is closer to choosing an application platform than choosing a specialized DBaaS.

Self-managed MySQL or Postgres

Self-hosting can reduce provider abstraction and increase control, but it also moves backups, upgrades, monitoring, failover, security, disk growth and incidents back to your team. For small teams, compare that operating cost against the managed option rather than comparing only VM price.

Use VPS for Databases: What Small Teams Should Know when self-hosting is a serious candidate.

Pricing comparison: use the same workload

The providers in this comparison do not bill the same thing, so headline starting prices should not be treated as equivalent production costs.

Before comparing cost, define:

engine
+ required memory / CPU
+ average and peak load
+ database size
+ monthly growth
+ read/write pattern
+ HA requirement
+ backup / PITR requirement
+ public egress
+ region
+ development branches
+ extra backend services

Then price each provider against the same workload.

A free tier can be ideal for development but irrelevant to a production HA cluster. A $5 single-node plan is not equivalent to a three-node HA cluster. A usage-based database can be extremely inexpensive when idle and more expensive when continuously active.

Compare equivalent outcomes, not marketing entry prices.

Migration from PlanetScale: identify whether you are moving providers or database engines

The first migration question is whether the target uses the same database family.

PlanetScale Vitess to Raff Managed MySQL

This keeps the application in the MySQL ecosystem, but it is still not a simple server copy. Vitess adds its own topology, routing and operational behavior. Validate:

• SQL and feature compatibility used by the application;
• schema and index definitions;
• foreign key behavior used by the current PlanetScale configuration;
• connection limits and pooling;
• transaction patterns;
• table size and growth;
• data export/replication method;
• cutover and rollback approach.

PlanetScale Postgres to Raff or Neon Postgres

This is a same-engine provider migration, which generally reduces application rewrite risk, but you still need to validate:

• extensions;
• roles and privileges;
• connection strings and TLS;
• logical replication or migration tooling;
• sequence and identity state;
• backups and PITR expectations;
• connection pooling;
• cutover lag and rollback.

PlanetScale MySQL/Vitess to Neon or Supabase

This is a MySQL-to-Postgres migration. Treat it as an application and schema migration, not merely infrastructure replacement. Data types, indexes, SQL behavior, extensions, migrations and ORM behavior all need validation.

PlanetScale alternative migration checklist

• Confirm whether the source is PlanetScale Vitess or PlanetScale Postgres.
• Decide whether the target keeps the same database engine.
• Inventory schema, indexes, extensions and database-specific features.
• Measure production database size and write rate.
• Document connection and transaction patterns.
• Define HA and recovery requirements on the target.
• Map backups and PITR expectations.
• Identify PlanetScale branch/deploy workflows that must be replaced.
• Test application queries against the target before moving production data.
• Choose replication, logical migration or export/import based on the engine pair.
• Define a cutover window and rollback condition.
• Verify consumer/background jobs do not continue writing to the old database after cutover.
• Validate application behavior and business data before deleting the source.

Which PlanetScale alternative should you choose?

Stay with PlanetScale when

• Vitess horizontal scaling is a real requirement;
• PlanetScale's branching and deploy-request workflow saves your team meaningful engineering time;
• non-blocking schema changes are part of frequent production releases;
• the current resource-based pricing matches workload economics;
• moving away would require rebuilding database workflows that are already working well.

Choose Raff when

• standard managed MySQL 8 or PostgreSQL fits the application;
• predictable fixed monthly plans matter;
• the team wants a free development/small-workload database option;
• conventional ORM and framework compatibility is more important than Vitess-specific scale;
• migration assistance and direct human support are valuable;
• the team wants multiple managed data engines under one provider.

Choose Neon when

• Postgres is the target engine;
• scale-to-zero is valuable;
• database branching is central to development and preview workflows;
• usage-based serverless pricing fits an intermittent workload.

Choose Supabase when

• the application needs Postgres plus auth, storage, realtime and APIs;
• consolidating backend services is more important than buying a database independently.

Conclusion

PlanetScale is no longer a product that can be summarized as “serverless MySQL.” In 2026 it is a broader cloud database platform spanning PlanetScale Postgres and Vitess, with sophisticated branching, schema-deployment and performance workflows.

That means the best alternative depends on what part of PlanetScale you actually value.

Choose Raff when the goal is a familiar managed MySQL or Postgres database with a free tier, fixed paid plans from $7.99/month, backups and managed operations without adopting a specialized distributed-database workflow. Choose Neon when serverless Postgres and scale-to-zero are central. Choose Supabase when the database should arrive with a full backend platform. Stay with PlanetScale when Vitess, database branching, safe migrations, or its high-scale workflow materially reduce engineering work.

The right migration is the one that removes complexity your team does not need without throwing away capabilities it actually depends on.

Sources

• PlanetScale Pricing
• PlanetScale Features
• PlanetScale Vitess
• PlanetScale Changelog
• Neon Usage-Based Pricing
• Neon Compute Price Update
• Neon Data Transfer Update
• Supabase Pricing
• Raff Managed Databases
• Raff Managed MySQL
• Product and pricing details reviewed: 2026-08-24